(承叶二十二正末)——这疑难在拉夫俄沙亚的斋舍里提出,他们就来问 拉比阿西。他对他们说:他们所定「遗精者当浇水」,只是就病人照常遗精说的;病人若非出于自主而遗,显然一概得免,全不必浸洗。拉夫约瑟 说:若是这样,拉夫纳赫曼 那只瓮又接上了——意思是于洁净一事仍旧有用。
-
——这一疑难在 拉夫俄沙亚 的斋舍里提了出来,他们就来问 拉比阿西。
that this problem was raised in Rav Oshaya’s chamber, and they came and asked Rav Asi.
-
他对他们说:他们所定「遗精不洁的人当浇水」这一条,只是就病人照常遗精说的;病人若非出于自主而遗,显然一概得免,全不必浸洗。
He said to them: They only stated the obligation to pour water over one who is impure because of a seminal emission with regard to a sick person who experienced a normal seminal emission, but a sick person who experienced an involuntary seminal emission is clearly exempt from anything and requires no immersion whatsoever.
-
拉夫约瑟 说:若是这样,拉夫纳赫曼 那只瓮又接上了——意思是它于洁净一事仍旧有用。
Rav Yosef said: In that case, Rav Naḥman’s jug is rejoined, meaning that it is effective with regard to purification.